My Thoughts on Comments

The following thoughts are over a few comments left by people on The Diplomat's article I posted about in my last post. If you recall this article highlights the relationship between China and Japan with regards to historical events. Author is Chinese and supports the idea that the Japanese must apologize for the horrific implementations the Japanese played on the Chinese during World War II.

Below are a total of four comments made by people who wanted to express their opinions. I have listed two comments as of containing credibility on the subject. The other two are labeled as being of lacking credibility or containing no credibility at all for the topic at hand.

1. Comment #1: Credible

Screenshot taken from The Diplomat. Tao, Xie. The Politics of History in China-Japan Relations.
August 10, 2015 via The Diplomat. Public Domain Dedication.

1. This commenter does not express any fear or anxiety on the subject, but he does introduce a wish of his for both countries to become mutually beneficial to one another. His mood remains calm and he does not express any anger or extreme emotions.

2. He holds a strong belief that both countries can once again prosper together. Maybe not along the lines of an actual strong and firm friendship but hints at the idea that the two can work together socially and possibly economically.

3. To me, this commenter remains calm and reserved. He does not call out any specific person or country as being the "bad guy." He points out several reasonable ideas to better the relationship between China and Japan.



2. Comment #2: Lacking Credibility

Screenshot taken from The Diplomat. Tao, Xie. The Polotics of History in China-Japan Relations.
August 10, 2015 via The Diplomat. Public Domain Dedication.

1. Commenter, johnniewhite, doesn't present any opinion with regards to the article whatsoever. He does however note, for some odd reason, that he wants more "Chinese intellectuals" to contribute to the historical knowledge of this article. He doesn't seem to enjoy what author, Xie Tao, had to say.

2. This commenter holds no belief for the subject presented by the author. He only seems to be worried about who the author actually is. "johnnie" infers that the author is lacking credibility.

I base this on his comment towards his statement of "outstanding contributions" being rare. He even states that he would rather have a Mr Ming Shi add his opinions.

3. To me, this commenter lacks credibility of his own based on his judgement of Mr Xie Tao. He states that the "intellectuals in Diplomat" need "real historical knowledge."


3. Comment #3: Lacking Credibility

1. Commenter, Son Tran, conveys anxiety on the subject of Chinese-Japanese relations. From my analysis, this commenter is a female. She only comments on what Mao Zedong is and what he has done. She calls him, "merciless, callous, cold blood[ed]" to say the least.

2. She believes that Mao is the problem to all Chinese rule. She does present some points on how Mao only wants power and that he does everything in his own interest. These ideas may seem credible, but her blatant attack on Mao decreases her comment's credibility.

3. This commenter is obviously lacking credibility in her comment. She verbally attacks and slanders Mao Zedong just to make an inconsistent point. Although some ideas are presented that may act as actual fact, her initial comment on Mao is unbelievable.


4. Comment #4: Credible

1. DC Washington wants for the Japanese to atone to their sins of cruel and unusual punishment towards the Chinese. He states firmly that if they do not, they will have to live with fear.

He comes off as a knowledgable but subtle person who wants for both countries to resolve their difference, but at the expense of the Japanese

2. This commenter believes that once Japan apologizes for their actions, then the relationship between China and Japan can be renewed. He even states that the Germans have atoned and are now friends with nations once enemies. This may come off as "lacking credibility" because he makes an inference to state this, but overall this is thus far a true comment.

3. The credibility of DC Washington seems solid. His comment on Germany and how they have "atoned" may seem a bit out of the ordinary, but as I have stated, thus far his comments are true.



Reading over my peers' blogs, Isabel's and Alyssa's, I totally see now that some people can be extremely out of line when it comes to personal opinion. In both of their posts, My Thought on Comments, the commenters they've labeled as lacking credibility are very much so. I thought the commenters I chose lacked credibility and they do, but looking at controversial opinions on other matters, I find that simply lacking can turn into crazy and absurd.

My Controversy

When people think of "controversy" they might think of politics or scandal. I found a recent article on the relationship between China and Japan as how journalists see it as of this year. The controversial opinions that each country has of one another are out of proportion and many see this as a nearly unobtainable mutual friendship.

Snapshot via The Diplomat. Tao, Xie. The Politics of History in China-Japan Relations. August 10, 2015.
Public Domain Dedication.

The analysis of the article by The Diplomat, highlights the history of Chinese-Japanese relationships. The current relationship between China and Japan wasn't always this way. Even after World War II, and through the gruesome events incurred by the Japanese on the Chinese, the tensions were nearly non-existent. Once the Japanese started erasing history from their textbooks of the occupation of China, and their blasting of China's radical communism, the Chinese people started to resent their relationship with Japan and cut most ties with them.

From this article we can tell that the author is pro-Chinese; telling from his opinions and especially from the tab towards the top of the article that reads, "CHINA POWER." Author, Xie Tao wants the Chinese people to read his article and protest against the Japanese; wanting them "to apologize -- verbally or in written form."

Coming from Asian decent, this article interested me and my background.

Calendar Reflection

PublicDomainPictures. "Man Student College School Library Study Research." May 2014 via pixabay.
Public Domain Dedication.

It's only been one week through my four year college journey and I've already felt the stress-sweat trickle down my face. When people say that college is a life-changing experience they truly meant it. Not saying college is multi-year prison sentence, actually its quite the opposite. So far I've met so many new people and lived through so many new events; everything seems to be going swell.


The main idea that I am trying to convey is that college should be full of excitement. As I trudge through the the sixteen units I'm taking this semester with aspirations of gaining a degree in either chemical or biomedical engineering, I find that time-management is a must during my stay here at the University of Arizona.


From the time I wake up either at 6:30am or 9:00am depending on the day of the week, I know that I should be prepared for the day ahead. Trying to balance academics with a social life and other extracurricular activities is the goal for many and I am one of the many.


My plan throughout college is to stay on top of my work and create objectives daily for me to work through and complete by their deadlines. Something I've learned throughout school is to write EVERYTHING down. Even if it doesn't seem of any importance, it probably is.


Reflection

Reading through Savannah's blog, Blahg, and Alyssa's blog, Alyssa Bohland, I found myself intrigued by how much these girls have for this semester. Especially Savannah being able to balance 18 credits while being in a sorority and seeking an engineering degree. I almost want to say that she's crazy but I envy her dedication. Taking from their statements, I too hope to find a good balance between academics, a social life and any other extracurricular activities that may arise. I can easily say, the three of us all strive for a successful future.

My Writing Process

I wouldn't call myself a master at writing nor would I deem me to be totally inept at putting down anything whether it be for an essay or a blog post. As a person who labels writing and reading as the work of the devil, the thought of "blogging" has put me in a place of utter confusion as to what must become of life. I don't enjoy the contemplating that my brain has to do to understand such a task, but I enjoy the thought of placing my ideas and thoughts on a page for all to see.

Add ClkerFreeVectorImages. "Panda Confused Questions Shrug Animal Cartoon." July 2014 via pixabay.
Public Domain Dedication.caption

1. What type(s) of writer do you consider yourself to be?

Taking from experience of writing my college essay even before I chose where I would be going to the present day (which is right now), I find myself along the lines of a "heavy reviser" and a "sequential composer." I stated, "right now" because I would also find myself to be a bit of a "procrastinator" more often than I would like.


2. Does your writing process include several of the above approaches? If so, which ones?

My writing process is a mixture of being a "heavy reviser" and a "sequential composer." Often I find myself writing endless amounts just to have to cut it all in half because my ideas wouldn't make sense with it. I spend an equal amount of time planning and drafting while revising takes nearly all the time of creating what I would call "a masterpiece."


3. Does your writing process seem to be successful? What are the strengths and weaknesses of your approach?

As I contemplate my thoughts and try to lay out an answer to the above question, I cannot help but see myself in the same position as I was in high school. This time in my life can be easily dubbed a time of procrastination. At this exact moment, I encounter a flashback of my high school self. Writing without a purpose but with a goal of obtaining greatness (aka a good grade). As already indirectly stated, my weaknesses in my writing abilities contribute mainly towards my procrastination. My strengths are that once I have a strong idea, I tend to write nothing but the best to reach my goal.


4. Do you think it might be beneficial for you to try a different approach? Why or why not?

As a pretty shitty writer myself, I would think that changing the way I even perceive writing should be altered. For this such blog post, I find myself procrastinating beyond understanding. For future assignments I would want to plan in advance to what I want to place down for my audience to see.

Reflection

As I read through Trey's blog, The Ladder of Abstraction, I found it hard to relate to his writing process. Him being of all four categories and me only having two of the attributes makes it difficult to understand how his process works for him. It surprised me to find that he is a heavy planner while also being somewhat of a procrastinator. From Trey I can maybe learn how to become a heavy planner and possibly an even better writer.

Reading Jessica's blog, Bloggin', made me feel better about myself being a procrastinator. She had stated that she is mainly a sequential composer as well as a procrastinator just like I am. Her statement about a "procrastination monster" made me laugh and relate to her feelings towards writing. We both seem to be the kind of people to wait till the last minute to complete a paper, but in the end actually come out on top.